Genesis 1.1 and the Importance of Comparing Translations
In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth, ...(NRSV)
When God began to create heaven and earth... (JPS, R. Alter)
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. (NASB; ESV)
These three translations reflect at least different nuances for the first two, and there is a significant difference between the first two and the last one. I will group the first two together for the sake of brevity. The major difference between the first two translations and the third translation is that in the first two the verse is taken as a dependent clause, whereas in the last one it is taken as an independent clause.
One might wonder what difference this makes, but it makes a great deal of difference. The difference is whether Genesis 1.1 purports to go back to the beginning of all things (Independent clause version) or whether it only goes back to a time when God is forming the world out of an earth that is already existing "formless and void" (dependent clause version). This is not just significant for those who take Genesis 1.1 literally, which I do not. It is also significant for interpreters who want to understand ancient Israelite beliefs about Creation.
It would not be possible to solve this translation difficulty here because it seems that there is no consensus at this time. The NRSV actually gives a note for all three translation possibilities in the electronic version that I have. This example does, however, point out the importance of comparing translations when one is studying the Hebrew Bible, unless perhaps the reader has a good command of Hebrew. Comparing translations can clue one in to where there are difficulties in the Hebrew text and promote moderation when one is speaking about these texts.